🔸
KEM's for mission-driven innovation
Download pdf in DutchNederlandse versie
  • Key Enabling Methodologies (KEMs) for mission-driven innovation
  • Tabel of contents
  • Introduction to the agenda
    • 1. Introduction
      • 1.1 Background: Mission-driven Innovation Policy
      • 1.2 Key Enabling Methodologies or KEMs
      • 1.3 Categories of KEMs
      • 1.4 Conditions and the use of KEMs
      • 1.5 This agenda
  • Categories
  • 2 Vision and imagination
    • 2.2 State of the art
    • 2.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 2.4 References
  • 3. Participation and co-creation
    • 3.2 State of the art
    • 3.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 3.4 References
  • 4. Behaviour and empowerment
    • 4.2 State of the art: perspectives on behavioural change
    • 4.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 4.4 References
  • 5. Experimental Environments
    • 5.2 State of the art: from modeling to experimentation
    • 5.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 5.4 References
  • 6. Value Creation and upscaling
    • 6.2 State of the art
    • 6.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 6.4 References
  • 7. Institutional change
    • 7.2 State of the art
    • 7.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 7.4 References
  • 8. System change
    • 8.2 State of the art
    • 8.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 8.4 References
  • 9. Monitoring and effect measurement
    • 9.2 State of the art
    • 9.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 9.4 References
  • Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy
    • 10. Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy
      • 10.1 Programming and KEM research
      • 10.2 Methodological challenges in the missions
      • 10.3 Cohesive application
  • Notes
    • About the development of this agenda
    • Colophon
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. 2 Vision and imagination

2.4 References

Previous2.3 Challenges and research questionsNext3. Participation and co-creation

Last updated 4 years ago

Blokdyk, G. (2019). Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis. 5STARCooks.

Carson, R. (1962). The Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Dorst, K. (2015). Frame Innovation: Create new thinking by design. Cambridge: MIT press.

Goetheer, A., van der Zee, F., & de Heide, M. (2018). De Staat van Nederland Innovatieland 2018: Missies en ‘nieuw’ missiegedreven innovatiebeleid. Den Haag: TNO.

Hajer, M. (2017). De Macht van verbeelding. Oratie Universiteit Utrecht. Retrieved from:

Hasberg, M., Weima, I. & van Lier, L. (2012). Technology Roadmapping – waarom, wat en hoe? Den Haag: TNO.

Hekkert, P. & van Dijk, M. (2011). Vision in Design: A Guidebook for Innovators. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.

Jansen L. (1994). Towards a sustainable future, en route with technology!. In: Dutch Committee for Long-Term Environmental Policy (Eds.), The Environment: Towards a Sustainable Future. Environment & Policy, vol 1. Springer: Dordrecht.

Kahn, H. (1965). Thinking About the Unthinkable. New York: Horizon Press.

KNAW (2018). Maatschappelijke impact in kaart. Amsterdam: KNAW.

Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition Management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State. Anthem Press.

Robinson, J. B. (1982). Energy Backcasting: A Proposed Method of Policy Analysis. Energy Policy, 10(4), 337-344.

Szczelkun, S. (2018). SENSE THINK ACT: a collection of exercises to experience total human ability. Stefan Szczelkun.

Wack, P. (1985). Scenarios: Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review, November-December 1985, 63(6), 139-150.

Wells, H. G. (1901). Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought. London: Chapman & Hall.

https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/20170320-uu_oratie-hajer.pdf