> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://kems-en.clicknl.nl/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://kems-en.clicknl.nl/7.-institutional-change/7.4-references.md).

# 7.4 References

Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalization theory to institutional design. *Planning theory, 4*(3), 209-223.

Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: *Political Science & Politics,* *44*(4), 823-830.

De Bruijn, J. A., ten Heuvelhof, E. F., & in 't Veld, R. J. (2010). *Process management: why project management fails in complex decision making processes.* Berlin: Springer.

Gupta, J., Termeer, K., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., & Nooteboom, S. (2010). Institutions for climate change: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. *Environmental Science & Policy, 13,* 459-471.

Johansson, R. (2009). Vision Zero - Implementing a policy for traffic safety. *Safety Science, 47*(6), 826–831.

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In: J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: *Ambiguity, agency, and power (1*, 1-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meijerink, S., & Stiller, S. (2013) What kind of leadership do we need for climate adaptation? A framework for analyzing leadership functions and tasks in climate change adaptation. *Environment and Planning C, 31*(2), 240-256.

Ministerie van Economische Zaken. (2016). Werken aan toekomstbestendige wetgeving en een toekomstbestendig wetgevingsproces, 6 juli, DGBI-R\&I / 16098216.

Morgan, G., Campbell, J., Crouch, C., Pedersen, O. K., & Whitley, R. (2010). *The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis.* Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2005). *Understanding Institutional Diversity.* Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. *Science, 325*(5939), 419-422.

Pelzer, P., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. P .C. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy - How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law. *Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33*, 1-12. 

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). The institutional logics perspective. *Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: an interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource*, 1-22.

van Bueren, E., & Klievink, B. (2017). Institutionele leegte: nieuwe bronnen, nieuwe uitdagingen. *Bestuurskunde, 26*(3).

Van Est, R., & Brom, F.W\.A. (2012). Technology assessment: Analytic and democratic practice. In: Chadwick, R. (Ed.), *Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics* (2nd ed., 4, pp. 306-320). San Diego: Academic Press.

Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., de Jong, J., & Keijser, B. (2020). Paradoxes of collaborative governance: investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. *Public Management Review, 22*(3), 386-407.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://kems-en.clicknl.nl/7.-institutional-change/7.4-references.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.