🔸
KEM's for mission-driven innovation
Download pdf in DutchNederlandse versie
  • Key Enabling Methodologies (KEMs) for mission-driven innovation
  • Tabel of contents
  • Introduction to the agenda
    • 1. Introduction
      • 1.1 Background: Mission-driven Innovation Policy
      • 1.2 Key Enabling Methodologies or KEMs
      • 1.3 Categories of KEMs
      • 1.4 Conditions and the use of KEMs
      • 1.5 This agenda
  • Categories
  • 2 Vision and imagination
    • 2.2 State of the art
    • 2.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 2.4 References
  • 3. Participation and co-creation
    • 3.2 State of the art
    • 3.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 3.4 References
  • 4. Behaviour and empowerment
    • 4.2 State of the art: perspectives on behavioural change
    • 4.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 4.4 References
  • 5. Experimental Environments
    • 5.2 State of the art: from modeling to experimentation
    • 5.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 5.4 References
  • 6. Value Creation and upscaling
    • 6.2 State of the art
    • 6.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 6.4 References
  • 7. Institutional change
    • 7.2 State of the art
    • 7.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 7.4 References
  • 8. System change
    • 8.2 State of the art
    • 8.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 8.4 References
  • 9. Monitoring and effect measurement
    • 9.2 State of the art
    • 9.3 Challenges and research questions
    • 9.4 References
  • Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy
    • 10. Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy
      • 10.1 Programming and KEM research
      • 10.2 Methodological challenges in the missions
      • 10.3 Cohesive application
  • Notes
    • About the development of this agenda
    • Colophon
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy
  2. 10. Methods in the Mission-Driven Innovation Policy

10.2 Methodological challenges in the missions

Previous10.1 Programming and KEM researchNext10.3 Cohesive application

Last updated 4 years ago

In all missions and in each of the four mission KIAs and the KIA Social Earning Capacity, many links and questions about methods can be discovered. In principle, methods from all eight KEM categories can be relevant for each mission and each mission theme. This has to do with the nature of the missions: they concern transitions of systems (system change) in which, for example, the bringing together and alignment of many stakeholders (participation and co-creation) and getting a grip on the effects of interventions to bring about the transitions (monitoring and effect measurement) will always play a role.

Yet we also see that a number of categories receive a lot of attention per theme. In order to provide tools for prioritising methodological challenges in the programming within the mission themes, the table below indicates per mission theme which KEM categories seem most relevant to achieving the mission objectives. It concerns a generic initial inventory; a proposal at theme level that can be further elaborated on the level of MJPs / MMIPs and research questions in consultation with the parties involved and in the forums surrounding the KIAs.

Table 1: Inventory of the most relevant KEM categories for each mission theme